Hepatitis, Diphtheria, Rubella..Each year millions of children are vaccinated in order to prevent potentially fatal illnesses like these. But should schools be able to mandate vaccines? Some parents see them as vital lifesavers, but others fear serious or perhaps even debilitating risks. How much authority should schools have in determining your child’s health?
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter.Away to the window I flew like a flash,Tore jus81ds open the shutters and threw up the sash.
Wholesale Cheap Hats
Cheap New Era Hats
Wholesale New Era Hats
New Era Hats
Cheap New Era Hats Wholesale
great idea !
kitchens
Have you ever wondered Coach Outlet Online what precisely is recognised like Coach Purses Outlet and why you will get lower Louis Vuitton Outlet Online, Coach handbags from them? Why do they exist anyway Coach Factory Outlet? is not the brand brand name Coach Outlet Store Online helps make you the Clearance Coach Factory Outlet Online and affordable only toward rich Coach Outlet Online Like all handbag designers and Factory manufbasicrers, Coach Factory Outlet is not shy from making mistakes within their Designer Coach Factory Outlet Online production or create more store than usual. Coach Handbags Outlet is a type of bag that is worn over one shoulder with a strap around the chest resting the bag on the lower back. Our Louis Vuitton Purses Outlet with fashion style from Coach Outlet Online, delicate outlooking, Coach Outlet Online offer top quality and the cheapest price. Welcome to Coach Outlet Store Online to choose your favorite! These Nike Dunk Shoes are ordinarily named rejects or over stocks. Because of the remarkable reputation and superb excellent control, onhavenly the "perfect" Gucci Backpack get shipped away from your factory to standard Coach outlet.
Bar stools on discountWomen and Boys sales internet retail web-sites, along with these include gucci kids Gucci the revolutionary yr Fall Fit in, prospective purchasers Jordan Take Flightit is possible to go to merely tiny needles with Nike Jordan 1things, rendering it less complicated study lower duplicate object although we’re genuine.Even so, in the event the stitching Nike Jordan 8adjoining your show seem uneven or maybe inside very poor health and wellbeing embroidered gucci divider, and then it’s every deceitful plus the discover was previously down loaded to bring back seem specialized. In case one example is the actual mobile computer Nike Air Yeezytote should be clean and different, next the actual signify are to be truly round Supra Shoesabout the bottom level longer compared to a single sides. Examine the Sell Christian Louboutin High Heelsactual emblem in order to avoid pictures one example is actual Gucci personalisation undoubtedly. 2Inspect the health andGianmarco Lorenzi shoes fitness the labels definitely do. Each genuineSell Nike Retro Jordan Gucci lines use a grace airborne filth and debris present protection to be able to that’s truly Nike Jordan 9created excellent 100 % cotton. An average light frequently referred to as cheap-looking debris disguiseNike Jordan 15 may possibly be a system just how an knowledge very Jordan accoladesmuch fabricated.Show up Fit in, possible prospective buyers you are able to go to only small needles with Cheap UGG Bootsproducts, which makes it less complicated investigation affordable reproduction products even though were genuine. Find indicatioUGG Classic Metallic Boots 5812 different false Gucci owner so that you can be sure to are usually UGG Classic Fancy Boots 5875carrying out a sincere Ugg Bailey Botton Boots 1886software. ModerateInstructions1Make exact the actual company on the internet laptop computer tote consistently is usually an regular Gucci promoting. In counterfeited equipment make sure to redundant the planning of the regular Gucci personalisation, along with i do think to help powered down verdict, plus the web page keep your pool regarding notice.
[url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/][b]GHD Hair Straighteners NZ[/b][/url] online shop provide you all kinds of [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/][b]GHD Hair Straighteners NZ[/b][/url], So you can choose whatever you like online directly. We will free shipping [url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/][b]GHD NZ[/b][/url] to NZ and Australia, even more all over the world. So there are different plugs here, Once you pay for [url=http://www.buyghdhairnz.net/products_new.html][b]GHD [/b][/url] Here, plz leave us a message about what plug [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/][b]GHD Hair Straightener[/b][/url] you want to choose. That's no doubt that [url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/products_all.html][b]GHD Hair Straightener Sale[/b][/url] has famous in NZ, so more people like to choose to buy them online. [url=http://www.discountghdhairaustralia.com/][b]GHD Hair Straighteners Australia[/b][/url] online shop provide you all kinds of GHDS online, In Addtion, [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/products_all.html][b]GHD[/b][/url] are popular in New Zealand, You can choose your style from [url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/reviews.html][b]Cheap GHD Straightener[/b][/url] shop directly. What's more, [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/reviews.html][b]GHD MK4 Sale[/b][/url] are quite good and powerful. In Addtion, [url=http://www.discountghdhairaustralia.com/index.php?main_page=specials][b]Cheap GHD IV Styler[/b][/url] are popular in New Zealand. There are more New arrivals are provided on [url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/products_new.html][b]New GHD Straightener[/b][/url], Furthermore, if you buy more [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/products_new.html?disp_order=7][b]GHD Hair NZ[/b][/url] from us, we will provide more than 50% discount here. So [url=http://www.ghd-hair-nz.org/specials.html][b]GHD Straighteners Sale[/b][/url]online shop is really a good choice for you.Our [url=http://www.buyghdhairnz.net/products_all.html][b]GHD Hair NZ[/b][/url] are specially designed according to local Australia conditions. [url=http://www.ghdshairstraightenersnz.org/ghd-deluxe-midnight-collection-gift-set-p-18.html][b]GHD NZ[/b][/url] are able to provide the perfect solution to people's needs,it's even easier to create perfect curls, waves or flicks, as well as the perfect straight. The [url=http://www.buyghdhairnz.net/][b]GHD NZ[/b][/url] shop offer GHD hair is a good looker.
Welcome to [url=http://www.pumashoes4sale.org/][b]Puma Shoes[/b][/url] online shop, Here will provide you good quality [url=http://www.pumashoes4sale.org/index.php?main_page=specials][b]Puma Australia Online[/b][/url]. Especially, the most popular series are provided from [url=http://www.nikeshox-norge.net/specials.html][b]Nike Shox Sko Norge[/b][/url]. Free shipping with fast delivery would be appreciated by more and more people, [url=http://www.nikeshox-norge.net/products_all.html][b]Nike Shox Shoes[/b][/url] will provide you. In Addition, [url=http://www.nikefreerun4sale.com/][b]Nike Free Trainers[/b][/url] are hotsale online either. You can choose your size and model, the [url=http://www.nikefreerun4sale.com/womens-nike-shox-shoes-nike-shox-r4-shoes-c-18_30.html][b]Nike Free Run[/b][/url] are put on by more and more people, If you buy, you must satisfy the shoes. Besides, All other Nike Shox Norge are provided [url=http://www.nike-shox-norge.org/][b]Nike Shox Rivalry[/b][/url] online shop now. You can choose your style and size from here, what's more, [url=http://www.nike-shox-norge.org/products_all.html][b]Shox NZ Nike[/b][/url] are best sale recently. In a word, [url=http://www.pumashoes4sale.org/reviews.html][b]Puma Factory Outlet[/b][/url] will provide you good feet feeling, [url=http://www.nikefreerun4sale.com/][b]Nike Shox Shoes[/b][/url] will keep your feet freely, certainly, [url=http://www.pumashoes4sale.org/][b]Puma Running Shoes[/b][/url] online shop will provide you good quality [url=http://www.pumashoes4sale.org/index.php?main_page=products_new][b]Cheap Puma Australia[/b][/url]. [url=http://www.nikefreerun4sale.com/][b]Nike Free[/b][/url] are hotsale online either. You can choose your size and model, the [url=http://www.nikefreerun4sale.com/mens-nike-free-50-c-5.html][b]Nike Free Running Shoes[/b][/url] are put on by more and more people, If you buy, you must satisfy the shoes.
Yes, the world is getting more compact and flatter, many thanks toward the internet. Discount UGG Boots Classic Tall Now, you can purchase a pashmina shawl UGG Boots Clearance Sale in US straight from Tibet and guys and ladies from China can straight purchase Lamingtons and Tim Tams straight away from your property cutting under. However, Discount UGG Roxy Tall Boots this interconnectedness is not without any drawbacks.Virtually is NOT as good as ReallyEven for all those that create a habit of purchasing online, you women's ugg classic cardy boots wouldn’t necessarily need to purchase from the institution dependent overseas. For instance, for all those that are thinking about of getting lifestyle insurance, you wouldn’t need to indicator up ugg classic cardy boots on sale owning a institution dependent in Russia. for all those that are getting groceries, you wouldn’t need to store within of a US dependent grocery store store. for all those that are getting a pair of shoes, a energy suit, perfume and women’s add-ons for just about any job ugg women's delaine boots 1886job interview subsequent week, you wouldn’t need to wait around two days for the purchase to arrive from China.
feiduting
We are the best soccer jersey supplier, all the soccer jerseys on jerseybbs.com are REPLICA SOCCER JERSEYS, but their quality are good, because many soccer jersey shopping websites are selling our discount soccer jerseys, espcially the thailand quality cheap soccer jerseys, They are the same as the official jerseys
According to a figure that most of the luxury brands consumer in China range frome 2os to 30s.
wholesale polo shirts are all young Women's love, wearing the designers will attract passerby glance, it make them be in good mood all the day.
With the increase in printing needs all over the world, manufacturers of Ink Cartridges are hard pressed to meet the ever-increasing demand. Consumer satisfaction ranks highest in the quest to fulfill company priorities. Buying printers is relatively cheap nowadays, but unfortunately, the Ecco Key West Mens same thing cannot be said about the CISS or cartridges that require to be replaced often.
The online store to buy replica Louis Vuitton bags, wallets and purse of top most designer
R4 Series,r4i Series,R4DS,R4i SDHC,R4i Gold,R4i Card for NDSi XL/NDSi/DSL/NDS - UseeGames.Com
cocogamer.com is one of most reliable sellers which engage in r4i gold and r4i sdhc , including all the most popular R4i and R4 3DS Cards at favorable price
feiduting
BrandDream, Top designer apparel supplier, FREE SHIPPING(for orders of 10pcs to US, UK, CA and AU), louboutin shoes, Cheap Ralph Lauren polo shirts, Cheap Ed Hardy Wholesale, juicy couture tracksuits, Cheap Christian Louboutin Shoes, Discount Sheepskin Boots, Wholesale Abercrombie, Christian Audigier Clothing and Shopping
wholesale designer clothing, accept Credit Card and PayPal, Quality Guarantee, Good Discounts and Trusty Business.
Do you know the different between the replica and fake watch? In fact the replica watches is made from the similar material and parts with the orginal one,the more important it is legal, however the fake is illegal.
A wide range of high quality and excellent perfermance wholesale Jerseys, wholesale nike shox, Cheap Nike airmax Shoes wholesale and Cheap Nike airmax Shoes in our shop welcome your visit.wholesale Jerseys, wholesale nike shox, Cheap Nike airmax Shoes, Cheap Nike airmax Shoes wholesale.
cheap soccer jerseys,replica soccer jerseys are very high sales volume, and many people liked to buy it replica soccer jerseyscheap soccer jerseys.
We mainly deal with handbags, shoes, garment, promotions and gifts. wholesale designer handbags, Wholesale shoes from china, wholesale fashion accessories, wholesale designer sunglasses, wholesale products from china. For many years' experience, our companies has been always complying with the contract and attaching great importance to good faith.
Newest styles and brands of hats & caps including baseball caps, new era cap, DC fitteds, fillipino flag hats and sports team caps.
We specialize in shower head andtowel rack of high quality and favorable price .The shower head that we provide has many advantages: 1. They quickly bring water; 2. The handles of environmental protection are in favour of our health;3.The color and style are wonderful. At the same time ,towel rack that we provide is durable and beautiful.We are sure that we will offer you satisfactory products and service
Anviz Biometric manufactures a complete range of biometric products including Fingerprint Time Attendance , fingerprint access control, fingerprint lock, USB fingerprint reader, OEM fingerprint module Fingerprint Access Control etc.
there's a reason why there were developed, to protect the young and weak. There's also a reason why the WHO is trying to get everyone under 18 in the WORLD vaccinated. Vaccines prevent deaths , millions of deaths, and millions of healthcare costs for children and seniors.
Get vaccinated so you dont have to deal with the ugly part later.
This should be for choice of the parent.
If you have no understanding of the history of vaccines , the current measles crisis in the UK (resulting deaths) or the HBV problem in Maine - you have no business commenting in this forum. Public schools have an obligation to protect the health of the children in their charge (this extends, by the way, to Universities). Parents who opt out of vaccination should be free to do so, however, a public institution may be entitled to deny that child entrance for the good of public health.
Vaccinating your children is an expression of total unwarranted trust in the U.S. Government. The science behind it is flawed from the start. It actually is a method of controlling the population and keeeping them sick and stupid to avoid revolt.Parents are told by lying school administrators that vaccination is manditory, and only relent when pressed to the limit by parents who know the real law regarding this subject. The schools always back down in the end when threatened with a lawsuit.Children's brains are damaged by vaccinations to the tune of a 10% reduction in I.Q., which is the desired result by the corrupt Federal Governemnt.Jonas Salk was a fraud, whose "victory" over polio was a result of his program luckily coinciding with a natural cyclic reduction in polio cases.
If you want to be against vaccination, that's fine. You're entitled to your own opinion. However, I urge you to base your opinion on facts - both so you'll have a stronger position in arguments, and for the sake of your own health. The assertion that vaccinations are a government method of population control rests on the falsehood that vaccinations were invented by the US government. If you do a little reading, you'll find that this is not true. You'll find that the idea of vaccination and the first experiments were performed before the US government existed. Simply checking Wikipedia would show you one of the first attempts at inoculation was performed by a mother on her own children - because the prospect of your child dying of a horrible, contagious illness like smallpox (which could take out your whole family, not just one kid) is perhaps even more terrifying than a 10% decrease in IQ (which, by the way, is nonsense. Please cite a source for that claim, but I doubt you can because comparative IQ tests on infants = patently absurd).
The FDA is a corrupt administration. You should NEVER trust anything they have to say.
Props to you for realizing that.
Vaccines have been linked to autism and many, many other problems. They really aren't all that effective either since vaccinated individuals can still contract said diseases.
It's part of the scam that Big Pharma and doctors are pulling on you to try to get you to waste money to pad their pocket books. Vaccines = poison. Rx drugs = poison. Period. Live naturally, use "natural medicine." These are the best defenses against disease..not a killed virus or something you can't even pronounce synthesized in a laboratory.
Vaccines are very effective against a large number of diseases. You can see the difference clearly by comparing our country where the over whelming majority are vaccinated and any country where vaccines are widely used or available.
No vaccine works a hundred percent of the time on a hundred percent of the people it used on. But that is hardly a good argument against vaccines.
There has been no documented proof that vaccines have anything to do with autism , not here in our country nor any other country. Even where the "controversial" vaccines suspected of causing higher rates of autism were removed, it made no significant change in the number of new cases of autism.
Finally, It's highly unlikely there is a Big Pharma conspiracy. Please check out the history of epidemics in just our country and how many hundreds of thousands, if not millions died regularly before vaccines came out. No matter how much a company makes on a vaccine, the low number of deaths caused by the diseases we get vaccinated for speak volumes about how effective they are.
Which vaccines do you claim are 'very effective?' Polio, for instance was on a sharp decline well BEFORE the vaccine was introduced. In fact, there was an increase in cases once the immunizations began. Countries which chose not immunize saw the same decline, or better, than countries that did. We can not accept information as facts just because the government or CDC says otherwise. Much of the 'data' that says they are effective are coming from the vaccine manufacturers.
the pharmaceutical companies do provide their own data, it gets published and then other institutions, here in this country and else where can run their own tests to see if they get the same results. This takes both time and money but the results are also published. For example you can go to the American Medical Association's web site as well as the CDC's and look up the studies performed on a wide number of medicines, vaccines and other health related topics.
would you mind posting links to where you got your information on polio as well as other countries. Can the same be said about Measles, Mumps, Rubella and many of the others we take? The go
..we can't do that here? I'll post what I've saved, but I encourage you to go from there and please show me anything you come across that may say otherwise. I am not interested in any government organizations or medical groups (they never speak for all that are a part of it.) Doctors, scientists, even crazy conspiracy theorists. I believe the best info I have acquired up to this point. Many of the things I am against now I was once for and vice versa. We grow we change ..just saying this to avoid arguments. I only want the truth.
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020132sinclair/vaccinaion.htm
http://www.relfe.com/vaccine.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/022617_disease_vaccination_vaccinations.html
http://www.gaia-health.com/articles/000010-Childhood-Vaccinations-Hoax.shtml
"No SIGNIFICANT difference." The key word being "significant" here, which even so, implies that there was a change. Strike one.
There is nothing that a vaccine can prevent that a natural, healthy organic diet (which will boost natural defenses) and proper exercise (which also boosts natural defenses) cannot. This is the con of so-called "Western Medicine." They've labeled that the only way diseases can be prevented or cured as synthesized drugs/vaccines. This is where they're sucker-punching unknowing victims into handing over their hard-earned cash.
Whistleblower and undercover investigator Kevin Trudeau tells all in the excellent book "Natural Cures THEY Don't Want You To Know About." This explains the FDA-Big Pharma-Physician conspiracy, and gives a remedies for some common things. Organic eating in controlled portions, proper exercise, and the occasional natural product with known medicinal value is all you need to live a long and healthy life (plus did I mention that you don't get any of the ill side effects?).
As far as schools requiring vaccines, you just can't do that. You know as well as I do certain religions prohibit it, and to mandate vaccines would be a violation of the establishment clause. Therefore you can't mandate it for all students.
Significant is an important word and when used to talk about statistical models is very specific. Since, in this case, there was no significant change, or a change that can't be explained by normally occurring variations when collecting data, we can infer that the change in vaccines or how they were applied was null in relation to new autism cases.
This supposed "con" has saved millions of lives. Since the human body is capable of producing a myriad of variations of itself how do you judge that organic eating has a higher rate of success than the vaccinations? What are the controlled portions for the majority of humans, since we know that each individual will need more or less of different organic foods because not all bodies require the same amounts of vitamins and nutrients? What are the natural products with known medicinal values? And how will we know that the medicinal values will be effective for the majority of people, how will know what amounts to give and how will we know if someone is allergic to them or not?
To answer these questions one is forced to use the same scientific methods and tests that pharmaceutical companies use.
And as a final note, I'm against making exceptions based on religious beliefs when it comes to public health and safety issues. It's ridiculous to put communities at risk because of archaic beliefs, as if viruses and illnesses care what the belief system of the body they are attacking is. Luckily, there are a tiny minority of religions that can lay claim to the establishment clause.
Here are just a few:
*Rauwolfia (lowers blood pressure, calms tachycardia, natural sedative/sleep aid).
*Ethanol (boost HDL cholesterol, reduces risk of heart disease, heart attack, and stroke, reduces risk of developing hypertension, among other things)
*Cannabis (yes, it's a very potent pain killer and should be legal)
Those are some of the things we can use to treat common ailments without drugs or surgery. There's something out there for every ailment we can think of, we don't have to synthesize unsafe drugs in laboratories (and trust me all drugs are unsafe, at least these natural medicines don't have any nasty side effects..but as I said, side effects are intentionally added by the drug companies because they want to keep you sick, not make you better).
If you're going to argue that it has saved millions of lives (of which I HIGHLY doubt), then I'm going to make this argument: Western Medicine is then in turn to blame for overpopulation (which is a HUGE problem we face today). Of course we could fight that by putting a limit as to how many children you can bear, but you get my point.
I'm a militant atheist, but I believe in the rights of people to practice whatever religious dogma they see fit as long as they don't impose it on me. This is their unalienable right and you have no right to take that away from them.
Aspirin is the standardized, active component from the bark of a tree. Your "natural" medicines all have substantial side effects (cannibis reduces sperm count, impacts short term memory and may increase the risk for reproductive problems in men). Any "element" which affects the human body is a "drug" whether it has been isolated and standardized (tested to understand side effects, etc.) is simply a matter of processing.
None of the examples you listed dealt with problems that vaccines take care of.
I maintain a healthy skepticism towards any "conspiracy" type theory, as such this relates directly to your suggestions about pharmaceutical companies.
Your local library should reels of newspaper accounts of how many people died in the early 1900's from epidemics that today we have vaccines for.
It's been a long time since I've heard some one argue the "over population" myth. The problem with it has always been on what basis does one come up with a limit on human population? Since the proponents of this myth always rely on distorted interpretations of data as well as subjective analysis, it is considered a fringe theory. This could become a real theory and provide valuable knowledge that would influence many social / legal decisions if valid scientific methods were used. Since this is not the case and real data (WHO, UN provide examples) that in many countries, there already is a trend towards a lower child birth rate compared to the death rate, western medicine is again, not the culprit.
Today's modern world of global finance capital and the diminishing real wage value of work produced has already had a bigger effect on lowering the number of children born, at least in the so called "first world" countries. The baby boomer generation is pretty much the last generation that grew up in large families. Of course there are exceptions, but large families, like my mother's (she has 7 brothers and sisters) are pretty rare today.
I'm just an atheist, and I totally support people believing what they want until public health issues are in question. Then I think society has a responsibility to keep the general population safe from spreadable diseases. Public health cannot be allowed to be trumped by archaic beliefs. However, like I pointed out, at least this is a very small minority of people that can claim exception. But in some countries this is a serious problem. Their irrational beliefs are causing children to die from preventable disease.
To help people? Yeah, sure. And I just named off the three biggest killers ever in history: heart disease, high blood pressure, and chronic pain which leads to suicide. These kill more people still today than any "epidemic" combined.
Read "Natural Cures" and then tell me there's no conspiracy. Kevin Trudeau has seen it all, as both a whistleblower and an undercover investigator. He reports his findings in his book. Of course, a lot of other things would be prevented if we stopped eating animal flesh but that's another point altogether.
So I also assume you support male genital mutilation for so-called " health reasons" (of course, there are no health reasons to perform this needless surgery right after birth).
Overpopulation IS a threat. I'm surprised at the lack of mathematical skills by both the UN and the WHO (hey, I have a degree in math so I can see right through their miscalculations). Population growth, as you know, is exponential. The estimated maximum human capacity of earth is about 13 billion. We're at almost 7 billion now, and since population growth is exponential we'll hit that pretty darn quick (within I'd estimate a few hundred years).
If your beloved vaccines are so effective then why are you worried about an unvaccinated minority? They won't get you sick will they? Or do you have some doubt these things actually work? That's the only conclusion I can reach given that you're so afraid of unvaccinated individuals. You shouldn't be worried at all, since your vaccinations are *so* effective right? Uh-huh, that's what I thought.
"To help people? Yeah, sure. And I just named off the three biggest killers ever in history: heart disease, high blood pressure, and chronic pain which leads to suicide. These kill more people still today than any "epidemic" combined."
The three biggest killers in history, or the three biggest killers of the modern world.. because modern medicine has reduced the risk of dying from other causes (like smallpox or being stabbed with a spear).
"If your beloved vaccines are so effective then why are you worried about an unvaccinated minority? They won't get you sick will they? Or do you have some doubt these things actually work?"
That shows a fundamental lack of understanding about how vaccines work.
First vaccines are not 100% effective, so even if you get one it may not provide complete protection. There are also people who cannot get vaccines due to medical conditions , or on whom it has worn of, as well as very young children who have not yet gotten it. The larger the number of vaccinated people there are the smaller the chance that a given virus will spread through the population. This is called Herd Immunity, the theory that if a large enough portion of the population is vaccinated against a disease then it provides protection against epidemics for the entire population.
Also, "herd immunity" is a coin termed by doctors to brainwash people. I hate doctors. I'll always hate doctors. I don't care how sick I get I won't see a doctor. I'll just ride it out and fight it off myself. There's nothing a doctor can cure that I can't cure myself.
Your car doesn't start 100% of the time, does that make it useless?
"Also, "herd immunity" is a coin termed by doctors to brainwash people."
How is that a term used to brainwash people? The theory is quite sound, the more people that are protected from a virus the smaller the chance an unprotected sick person will encounter an unprotected person who is not sick, preventing the disease from spreading through the population.
"I hate doctors. I'll always hate doctors. I don't care how sick I get I won't see a doctor. I'll just ride it out and fight it off myself. There's nothing a doctor can cure that I can't cure myself."
A burst appendix? A cerebral hemorrhage?
You do seem to have a very strong dislike for doctors, though it seems to be based on emotion rather then facts.
A burst appendix is not truly cured if it's removed. A hemorrhage isn't truly cured if it's clipped. So no, not even a doctor can cure those things. Simply remove or clip, just a fix, but not a cure. I'm not letting anyone cut a hole in my body for ANY REASON.
But, as I said, my living will prevents me from having to go through treatment for those things. It also prevents me from having any life-saving measures taken. It prevents me from being hauled to the hospital after a nasty car accident. It prevents me from ever receiving pretty much any medical treatment you can name, and if it means I die earlier because of a nasty accident then so be it, I'll die knowing I'm doing the right thing by hitting doctors where it hurts them the most..in their fat bank accounts. When doctors agree to do work for free and/or provide their services to those that can't afford it, maybe I'll think a bit differently about them. However, I follow the Natural Cures book. I never get sick. I haven't seen a money -hungry doctor in years. I actually have hypertension, however, I've resolved it by natural means. Isn't that amazing?
"A burst appendix is not truly cured if it's removed. A hemorrhage isn't truly cured if it's clipped. So no, not even a doctor can cure those things. Simply remove or clip, just a fix, but not a cure. I'm not letting anyone cut a hole in my body for ANY REASON."
-babpiper2005
How about the appendicitis condition itself? That is cured by through surgical removal of the appendix? Or what about advanced cases of cancer cured through chemo? Or organ transplants to cure kidney failure (or heart defects)? Blood transfusions following a traumatic injury? Limb reattachment?
Also, how many people have you met have had polio? Or had a relative die from smallpox? These are catastrophic diseases that killed many people, yet have largely died out since the introduction of vaccinations against those diseases.
"But, as I said, my living will prevents me from having to go through treatment for those things. It also prevents me from having any life-saving measures taken. It prevents me from being hauled to the hospital after a nasty car accident. It prevents me from ever receiving pretty much any medical treatment you can name, and if it means I die earlier because of a nasty accident then so be it, I'll die knowing I'm doing the right thing by hitting doctors where it hurts them the most..in their fat bank accounts. "
-bagpiper2005
a philosophical or ethical argument, but not one that casts doubt on the effectiveness of doctors.. indeed you acknowledge that doctors are effective when you state: "It prevents me from ever receiving pretty much any medical treatment you can name, and if it means I die earlier because of a nasty accident then so be it,"
"When doctors agree to do work for free and/or provide their services to those that can't afford it, maybe I'll think a bit differently about them."
-bagpiper2005
Like Doctors without Borders? Or how if you go to the emergency room to get emergency care the hospital is required to give it, even if you cannot pay (how it works in the US)? Or the national health care systems found in Canada and the UK? What other professions do you have the same high standards for? Are cooks ethically bankrupt because they don't provide free food ?
"However, I follow the Natural Cures book. I never get sick. I haven't seen a money -hungry doctor in years. I actually have hypertension, however, I've resolved it by natural means. Isn't that amazing? "
-bagpiper2005
I saw the a doctor for the first time in my 29 odd years about two months ago, when I had a fever of over 100 for several days. In general I am a healthy adult male who does not have an exceptionally stressful job, eats relatively well, and gets some exercise. Barring a serious accident the chances that I'll need to see a doctor are very low. Only a small number of people need to see a doctor on a regular basis, so your doctor free lifestyle isn't all that remarkable.
"I actually have hypertension, however, I've resolved it by natural means. Isn't that amazing?"
Unless it is acute hypertension is very manageable given the right lifestyle choices (low salt, lots of exercise, etc..). So claiming that you are in control does not mean that you have encountered the source of all health .
If by that you mean "primary" hypertension, then yes, this was the diagnosis. Take a mixture of rauwolfia extract and something else (look up Carditone Vegan Tablets) in addition to being a regular moderate drinker (which has a host of benefits other than for the heart) and everything is A-OK!
I refuse any and all of the treatments you listed. I would refuse surgery to remove my appendix. I would refuse blood transfusions. No organ transplants for me. No chemo/radio. NO NOTHING. My living will refuses ALL TYPES of medical intervention. EMS gets called out to a wreck, and I'm lying there bleeding to death, they have to let me die. It's that extreme.
"I refuse any and all of the treatments you listed. I would refuse surgery to remove my appendix. I would refuse blood transfusions. No organ transplants for me. No chemo/radio. NO NOTHING. My living will refuses ALL TYPES of medical intervention. EMS gets called out to a wreck, and I'm lying there bleeding to death, they have to let me die. It's that extreme."
-bagpiper2005
But you do agree that if it was not for you living will that the EMT's would be able to help you, and would possibly save your life using modern (western) medicine ?
It is my personal opinion that I would rather die than to be paralyzed for life, become an amputee, or something of that sort. That's why I refuse emergency treatment. Emergency treatment has its place (for those who are willing to live with being handicapped for the rest of their lives), however, due to the potential life-long effects (paralysis, loss of limbs) I'd rather just die than be "handicapped" personally.
"It is my personal opinion that I would rather die than to be paralyzed for life, become an amputee, or something of that sort."
-bagpiper2005
It's your choice not to take that chance, though I'm curious as to what that chance is. However what I am trying to get at here is the effectiveness of modern (western) medicine . If someone goes face first through a windshield and slides across the pavement then which system offers them the best chance of survival and a normal life? Western medicine or the practices in your 'Natural Cures' book.
"Emergency treatment has its place (for those who are willing to live with being handicapped for the rest of their lives), however, due to the potential life-long effects (paralysis, loss of limbs) I'd rather just die than be "handicapped" personally."
-bagpiper2005
Again, what are the statistics behind this? If I fall, break a rib and puncture a lung, what are the chances that I will end up handicapped if I go to the emergency room?
Face first thru the windshield onto the pavement = instantaneous death either way you slice it. Both are ineffective in this case.
Second situation leaves me VERY handicapped. Chances are I lose that lung, and I play a very air-intensive instrument, thus leaving me unable to play. Even so I'll have reduced lung capacity in that lung, which still leaves me unable to play the pipes. So that DOES leave me handicapped.
You can add subterfuge to subterfuge but you still haven't shown one natural remedy that takes care of the things vaccines take care of.
I have no idea why penises have been brought into this discussion or why you would assume to know what I think circumcision. Once again it has nothing to do with the effectiveness of vaccines.
You throw a number out like it proves something. Show me the reasoning behind that number and then we can discuss the scientific validity of the chosen values used to get to 13 billion or whatever other number that is said with so much certainty. Why you don't work with the UN or WHO and help correct their errors I and the rest of the world are trying to figure out.
As someone who has a degree in Math you should realize that there are more possibilities than the binary sets you present as logical arguments. I'm neither worried or over confident. I happen to understand how viruses and bacteria can evolve and become immune to current vaccines.
There are cures for AIDS, Herpes, etc. in the book "Natural Cures." All of these CENSORED from the general public because the GOVERNMENT doesn't want you to know about them because it would cut into their PROFITS. I don't have time to list them all. Heck, I'll even loan you the book(s) (it's actually a two book set) if you want!!! Or just go buy them off the shelf, they're cheap.
13 billion comes from biologists. This is the number that my biology professors taught was the "cap" in my biology classes (I have a biology minor). Population growth is based on the irrational number "e" as the base of the model. Euler's number (called "e") has an approximate value of 2.71828. If you knew about exponential functions and their graphs you'd know just how quickly they grow. Take even 2 to the 10th power. Do you know what that is? 1024!!! That's getting their by just multiplying 2 by itself 10 times, if that gives you an idea how quickly these numbers get big. So if we say this is time zero, and there are about 7 billion people in this world, the population model would be P(x) = 7,000,000,000e^(rt), where r is the average rate of growth and t is time. We have two variables multiplied together in the exponent. Where time is 0, P(x) = 7 billion, and as time moves along it goes from there. Obviously r is also variable as the rate of expansion changes as well. The value "rt" would only have to be about .6 or so for that to equal the magic cap of 13 billion.
I brought in genital mutilation because it's also a scam perpetrated by modern medicine. I figured if you fell for everything crooked medical practitioners told you then you'd surely believe the bogus they say about that.
There's a reason why I will NEVER see another doctor as long as I live..maybe by boycotting the medical industry they'll get the message..
"There are cures for AIDS , Herpes, etc. in the book "Natural Cures." All of these CENSORED from the general public because the GOVERNMENT doesn't want you to know about them because it would cut into their PROFITS."
Some investigation seems to indicate that "Natural Cures" is more of a scam then anything else. Also, even if there was a massive conspiracy in the US to suppress these 'cures' that does not limit their use in the rest of the world.
"The value "rt" would only have to be about .6 or so for that to equal the magic cap of 13 billion. "
What would be so catastrophic about hitting 13 billion?
Anyone who goes against traditional western medicine (a hoax..my god I hate doctors with a passion) is labeled a heretic and a quack. So why should I worry about what doctors say? My god I HATE doctors. As I said, that's why I have a living will in place that forbids any and all medical intervention, including life-saving treatments in case of emergency.
13 billion, given the available resources earth has to offer, is the upper limit of the human population that the earth can sustain. Go above that, and the earth can't sustain the human population.
Are pharmaceutical companies bastions of ethical and moral behavior? Absolutely not. In fact, I despise them.
That does not, however, have *anything at all* to do with medicine. Medicine is not inherently corrupt merely because those who profit off medicine are corrupt. Vaccines aren't poison just because you think some companies are bad. It's true that vaccines have been linked to autism , however the first study that did so - starting this frenzy - was recently revealed to be a scam. Some guy had an idea for a new vaccine, so he "proved" that MMR "caused" autism so that he could make a lot of money. How is that not greedy & unethical just like "Big Pharma"?
I certainly understand your anger at feeling that you're being lied to. However, in your outrage you have simply been fooled by another liar. Vaccines have been in use for a hundred years, and there has been a spike in autism in the last 15 years. If anything, it makes more sense to believe that cell phones cause autism. Before vaccines, even in the US we were threatened by "childhood" diseases that killed and disfigured for life. High childhood mortality is natural. So dead kids = good because they're natural?
When my GP wanted to put me on medicine for blood pressure that didn't merit medication (130/85, which is not deadly, and the whole 140/90 being too high is a load of crock too). Not to mention medical communities advocating for the mutilation of baby boys' genitals right after birth (anyone with any knowledge of intact male genitals knows that sleeve of skin has several necessary functions, but the medical community scares people into believing it's dirty and filthy and needs to be hacked off, however that's another debate altogether). There are other natural ways to lower your blood pressure without all the nasty side effects of medicine, and Big Pharma knows medicines carry side effects. They think this is a GOOD thing, because then people will need more medication and they get bigger profits.
The only reason you go into the medical/pharmaceutical industry is to get rich. You don't become a doctor to help people. You do it to pad your pocket book. Medical practitioners are greedy jerks, nothing more.
If modern medicine is so effective, how come we live shorter lifespans now than we did when it wasn't this advanced? Your comment of dead kids being good, well, children dying is unfortunate, but death is a natural process. We're overpopulated anyway, and need some form of population control (don't think by that statement that I advocate killing innocent children however).
Cell phones may very well cause autism . Heck, they've already been proven to more than double your risk for gliomas (a rare, but highly fatal brain cancer), and other types of brain tumors as well.
Life expectancy has increased since 1850. However, this increase is not automatic. Study the chart on life expectancy by age at http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html and you will see that life expectancy at many ages in Massachusetts was actually lower in 1890 than it was in 1850. However, after about 1970, life expectancy at quite advanced ages rose. One reason for this is the control of blood pressure, which has reduced the incidence of stroke and other serious diseases.
When it comes to modern medicine, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
M. Glass
Why on earth do you think that human lifespans are shorter than they were "before modern medicine"? Please tell me what time period you define as "before medicine was so advanced" so that I can look up the relevant mortality statistics. I'd be fascinated to see the actual numbers.
By the way, you seem to be missing my point, which is not that all medicines are good, nor that all practitioners of medicine are kind (although I disagree that everyone in medicine is a "greedy jerk," don't you think just might be over-extrapolation on your part?). I agree with you about some of the things you mentioned. My point is that you can disagree with things without spreading lies about them. There are factual reasons to be against all the things you mentioned, not just stereotypes and repeated misinformation.
When my nephew received his first flu shot, his face swelled up and his throat swelled closed. It turned out he was allergic to eggs, which are used in flu vaccines. How simple it would have been to test him first and avoid a life-threatening reaction!
Until vaccines are administered with more regard for the individual, they should not be mandated. Children should be screened for allergies and predisposition to certain side effects and then given only the vaccines which will limit dangerous reactions. Until then, parents retain the right to make those decisions for their children.
Let's step back and examine the economics of your proposal, however. The fact of the matter is that it would NOT have been trivial to "test him first." Allergy panels cost money and time, and when you distribute that across the entire population of a nation like the United States, that adds up to a prohibitive barrier to vaccination. You make medical decisions based not on what you do not know, but on what you do. Nobody knows that he has an allergy to anything until he has an allergic reaction. It's unfortunate that your nephew was in a minority group that had a reaction to that particular vaccination, but the fact remains that he's not dead, he was treated effectively, and the majority of other individuals will not experience that specific reaction, either because they have complete information already (you're not clear on whether your nephew already knew he was allergic to eggs and his parents failed to inform the administering professional or whether this was the first incidence of such a reaction) or because they're not in the right group.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102200042.html
This is a Washington Post report on how rare complications from the flu are and how ineffective the flu vaccine is at truly curbing those risks, including how flu-related deaths in the elderly have remained steady over the last two decades even though the number of older people getting the flu vaccine each year has increased dramatically.
You are right, I left some parts out. They didn't know he had that allergy until he had that reaction. Then, when he turned 12 months old (just one month later), the doctor tried to give him the MMR, which contains eggs, and the doctor was well aware of the reactions and subsequent allergu testing that had been done. His mother asked if it had eggs in it and the doctor said he didn't even know. She made him check and sure enough, there it is.
This happened to my son, as well. He is allergic to dairy, and his doctor still tried to give him the DTaP. Ingredients and potential allergens are not included on the information sheets that the CDC gives to doctors to pass out to patients, and those sheets are generally given AFTER the vaccine is administered so parents can look out for a limited number of typical reactions.
If many legislators have their way, there will be no exceptions, even medical ones. Dr. Paul Offit, a very vocal proponent of vaccines (and a patent holder of vaccines - how convenient) and author of a vaccine guide for parents, is a pusher of this agenda. So, my son and nephew would still have to get those vaccines or else be barred from attending school.
Meanwhile, the vaccine is considered ON THE PACKAGE INSERT to be about 70% effective, if scientists happened to accurately predict which flu strains would be the most problematic in any given year. For people over 65, it is estimated at 30-40%, again if the right strains were predicted. Side effects of the vaccine include asthma and Guillain-Barre Syndrome, which is temporary paralysis.
Last year over 3,000 negative reactions to the flu vaccine (including 29 deaths) were actually reported to the government (estimates are that for every reaction reported, ten are not reported).
It's too expensive to test people for reactions before they get a vaccine when it isn't your child in the hospital.
Forcing parents to inject their children with a moderately effective vaccine every year is vile. No one should be able to force anyone else to participate in any medicaly treatment, let alone one as unpredictable and of limited benefit as the flu vaccine.
Each year millions of people contract Influenza A and approximately 100,000 to 200,000 people DIE from this infection, globally. They tend to be immuno-compromised, very young or old. While the prediction of RNA mutations making up the current season's flu is difficult to predict, you can be sure that the death toll would be substantially higher in a non-vaccinating environment .
Deaths from Flu vaccine is roughly 1 in 10,476,712
negative reactions (with the estimated 10 unreported negative reactions 33,000) is roughly 1 in 9,200.
Negative reactions is an ambiguous term since more serious negative reactions are probably mixed in with minor reactions.
While being a parent of a child who suffers any type of negative reaction from a vaccine is surely a terrible and frightening situation. However, most people do not suffer any negative reaction. The variations the human body presents to us really does prohibit testing because the test creators would be constantly trying to catch up to the constant variation that each new person presents. In other words, a test that would have helped your child would fail to help another family's child. How would we learn that? Unfortunately, the hard way.
It's like many allergic reactions, many are learned the hard way. I have a sister and a nephew are also very allergic. But we had to learn each one (they have various allergies) one by one.
My sympathies are with you, but I would encourage you not to inflate your particular experience to mean that doctors don't care or that all vaccines are bad.
Personally, I have never taken or had my own daughter take a vaccine for the flu. The flu is a pain but it's no TB or other serious sickness that most of our vaccines treat. The other part of this though, is that neither I nor my daughters are allergic to practically anything. Funny how the genetics on this issue came out so different between my sister and I.
I posted those completely unscientific numbers above (I took your numbers and calculated them against the population of our country) to show that it is a statistical minority who suffer adverse effects. When we consider how many people died of the various diseases before we had vaccines to treat them, you will see the numbers were terribly negative.
Just consider measles, a disease that vaccines have practically eradicated here in the US, however, the World Health Organization reported that in 2007 "there were 197 000 measles deaths globally - nearly 540 deaths every day or 22 deaths every hour." This figure is a world wide estimate. The point is, a very simple and cheap vaccine can change this situation dramatically. Unfortunately, we are a long way from a vaccine that has a zero chance of negative effects.
Flu shots are mandatory.